UA
Back to Projects
Confidential Case StudyRisk Intelligence · NLP · Banking

CrediSignal — Real-Time Adverse News and Risk Intelligence Monitoring

An automated news intelligence pipeline that collects, matches, summarises, and risk-tags adverse news about banking entities — enabling proactive early-warning monitoring for credit and financial crime risk teams.

PythonAPIsWeb ScrapingLLM SummarisationEntity MatchingText CleaningRisk TaxonomyExcel / Dashboard

Executive Summary

Risk teams need timely monitoring of adverse news about clients, counterparties, directors, and connected parties. Manual monitoring does not scale. CrediSignal is an automated pipeline that collects relevant news, matches entities to banking records, summarises with LLMs, and surfaces risk-tagged output through structured reporting.

Business Problem

Adverse news — negative press about financial difficulties, legal issues, regulatory actions, or fraud allegations — is a key early-warning signal in credit and financial crime risk management. News APIs and web sources produce enormous amounts of content, most of it irrelevant to any given entity.

Entity matching is the hardest part of this problem. The same company may appear under multiple name variants, and common names require disambiguation before risk tagging is meaningful.

My Role

I led the design and development: entity list management, keyword generation, news collection, text cleaning, entity matching logic, LLM summarisation prompt design, risk taxonomy development, and output design for dashboard and Excel reporting.

Architecture

Entity List
Keyword Generation
News API / Scraping
Cleaning
Entity Matching
Summarisation
Risk Tagging
Dashboard / Excel

Risk Taxonomy

Summarised articles are tagged against a risk taxonomy covering major adverse news categories relevant to banking:

Financial DistressFraud / MisappropriationLegal / LitigationRegulatory ActionReputational EventSanctions / WatchlistOperational EventCredit-Relevant

Business Impact

Enabled proactive adverse news monitoring across a portfolio of banking entities
Reduced manual monitoring effort and improved coverage
Risk-tagged summaries supported faster analyst review and prioritisation
Provided an early-warning layer for credit review and financial crime risk monitoring

Lessons Learned

01Entity disambiguation is harder than it looks at scale. Common company name fragments match thousands of irrelevant articles without careful keyword design.
02Risk taxonomy design requires domain input — the categories that matter to a credit analyst differ from those relevant to an AML officer.
03LLM summarisation quality varies significantly by prompt design. Structured output prompts outperform free-form summarisation instructions.
04Start with the format the team already uses — analysts adopted the Excel output immediately.

Confidentiality Note: Due to employer obligations, code, raw data, proprietary models, and internal investigation details are not disclosed. This case study presents architecture, methodology, and business impact only.

All ProjectsDiscuss a similar challenge